WebHALFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT A. Background to the alleged telephone interceptions 9. In May 1983 Ms Halford was appointed to the rank of Assistant Chief Constable with the Merseyside police. As such she became the most senior-ranking female police officer in the United Kingdom. 10. On eight occasions during the following … WebJun 25, 1997 · Halford v. the United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights 25 June 1997 Facts. The applicant Ms.Halford was working for the police. Following a refusal to promote her, she started proceedings in the Industrial Tribunal claiming that she had been discriminated on the ground of gender. Ms.Halford alleged that certain members of the …
Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom
WebCommissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection WebHowever, the UK statutory scheme was again found to be inadequate by the Strasbourg Court. Halford v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 20605/92 (1997). Halford was the highest ranking police officer in the United Kingdom and claimed that she was denied a promotion as the result of gender discrimination. gateway office furniture
Halford v. the United Kingdom - cilvektiesibugids.lv
WebMay 10, 2011 · Max Mosley (the applicant) argued that, in order to protect his privacy, the U.K. “had an obligation to enable him to apply for an injunction by requiring that he be notified prior to publication of an article which interfered with his private life”. He further argued: (1) that the lack of a prior notification requirement encouraged editors ... WebFind many great new & used options and get the best deals for HALFORD JEFFREY - BEWARE OF WORTHLESS IMITATION - New CD - H4A at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products! ... Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United … WebJun 24, 2004 · Relying on Peck v. United Kingdom, App no. 44647/98 (January 28, 2003) among other cases, the court held that “(t)here is a zone of social interaction, even in a public context, which may fall within the scope of what is considered private life” [para. 50]. The purpose of Article 8 extends beyond the State’s negative obligation to not ... gateway office business center park city